Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1045389X06075028v1
19/2/243    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muhammad Ashiqur Rahman,
Right arrow Articles by Muhammad Anowar Hossain,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
This version was published on February 1, 2008
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 19, No. 2, 243-252 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1045389X06075028

Effect of Cross Section Geometry on the Response of an SMA Column

Muhammad Ashiqur Rahman

Department of Mechanical Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh, ashiq{at}me.buet.ac.bd

Sajedur Rahman Akanda

Department of Mechanical Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

Muhammad Anowar Hossain

Department of Mechanical Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

This numerical study investigates the effect of cross section geometry on the bending of a beam and also buckling of a column made of shape memory alloy (SMA). It incorporates superelastic SMA's non-linear stress—strain relations, including the non-symmetric behavior in tension and compression. Primarily, an arbitrary rectangular cross section is selected for analysis of the beam and column, loaded beyond the linear stress—strain relations. Then similar analysis is carried out for two different equivalent cross sections, namely, square of same area and square of same inertia, for comparing the effect of cross section geometry on the response of the beam and column. Using the equations of static equilibrium, the variations of effective modulus and bending moment for different equivalent cross sections are presented. The critical stress of the column is calculated by assuming an appropriate deflection curve for both ends hinged condition. It is found that the effective modulus depends only on the stress—strain curve. The bending moment, on the other hand, is a function of the stress—strain curve and cross section geometry. For a given load, the square of same area develops the minimum bending stress, while the square of same inertia develops the maximum bending stresses. Because of the non-symmetric stress—strain curve, the compressive stress is found to be higher than the tensile stress. It is also found that the buckling load for a column is distinctly high if the non-symmetric stress—strain curve is used in the analysis. Moreover, for a very high critical stress, the square of same area has the highest slenderness ratio, while the rectangle has the lowest slenderness ratio.

Key Words: symmetric stress—strain relation • non-symmetric stress—strain relation • critical stress • equivalent cross sections • square of same area • square of same inertia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?