This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1045389X08097387v1 20/9/1017    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fernberg, P. Articles by Joffe, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Piezoresistive Performance of Long-Fiber Composites with Carbon Nanotube Doped Matrix

SICOMP AB, P.O. Box 271, SE-941 26 Piteå, Sweden, patrik.fernberg{at}sicomp.se

Greger Nilsson

SICOMP AB, P.O. Box 271, SE-941 26 Piteå, Sweden

Roberts Joffe

Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden

The electrical and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube (CNT) doped epoxy resin and composites based on this matrix were studied. The investigation was carried out on neat nanocomposites and on structural composites i.e., when the nanocomposite is used as matrix in composite materials reinforced with long continuous fibers. Tensile tests showed that CNT doped epoxy exhibited clear piezoresistive behavior. It was, however, also shown that geometrical changes of the specimen also contribute significantly to resistance changes during tensile loading. Particular effort was made to establish the relations between transverse cracking in glass fiber cross-ply laminates with nanotube doped matrix and changes of electrical resistance. It was shown that changes of electrical resistance during tensile loading of composites containing CNT doped matrix gives highly relevant information about the damage state of the material. In an unloaded state the resistance change is proportional to the relative change of stiffness. This work demonstrates that there are three different mechanisms, which contribute to changes of electrical resistance of a composite specimen subjected to tensile strain. These three mechanisms are: (a) geometrical changes of the specimen (b) piezoresistive material response, and (c) accumulation of micro-damage.

Key Words: polymers • structural health monitoring • sensor.

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 20, No. 9, 1017-1023 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1045389X08097387


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?