Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Supervised Competitive Learning

Thomas H. Fuller, Jr

Department of Computer Science Washington University One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-4899

Takayuki D. Kimura

Department of Computer Science Washington University One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-4899

Supervised Competitive Learning (SCL) assembles a set of learning modules into a supervised learning system to address the stability-plasticity dilemma. Each learning module acts as a similarity detector for a prototype, and includes prototype resetting (akin to that of ART) to re spond to new prototypes. SCL has usually employed backpropagation networks as the learning modules. It has been tested with two feature abstractors: about 30 energy-based features, and a com bination of energy-based and graphical features (about 60). About 75 subjects have been involved. In recent testing (15 college students), SCL recognized 99 % (energy features only) of test digits, 91 % (energy) and 96.6% (energy/graphical) of test letters, and 85% of test gestures (energy/graphical). SCL has also been tested with fuzzy sets as learning modules for recognizing handwritten digits and handwritten gestures, recognizing 97% of test digits and 91% of test gestures.

Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 5, No. 2, 232-246 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1045389X9400500209


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?