Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aldraihem, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Distributed Control of Laminated Beams: Timoshenko Theory vs. Euler-Bernoulli Theory

Osama J. Aldraihem

Department of Mechanical Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800-Riyadh 11421, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.;Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4400

Robert C. Wetherhold

Tarunraj Singh

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4400

In this paper, the governing equations and boundary conditions of laminated beamlike components of smart structures are reviewed. Sensor and actuator layers are included in the beam so as to facilitate vibration suppression. Two mathematical models, namely the shear-deformable (Timoshenko) model and the shear-indeformable (Euler-Bernoulli) model, are presented. The differential equations of the continuous system are approximated by utilizing finite element techniques for both models. A cantilever laminated beam with and without a tip mass is investigated to assess the validity and the accuracy of the two models when used for vibration suppression. Comparison between the two models is presented to show the advantages and the limitations of each of the models. Since the Timoshenko beam theory is higher order than the Euler Bernoulli theory, it is known to be superior in predicting the transient response of the beam. The superiority of the Timoshenko model is more pronounced for beams with a low aspect ratio. It is shown that use of an Euler-Bernoulli based controller to suppress beam vibration can lead to instability caused by the inadvertent excitation of unmodelled modes.

Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 8, No. 2, 149-157 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1045389X9700800205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and StructuresHome page
X. D. Wang and G. L. Huang
Wave Propagation in Electromechanical Structures: Induced by Surface-Bonded Piezoelectric Actuators
Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, February 1, 2001; 12(2): 105 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]